What mattersShow
- Mohsen Shahini, a founder with experience at Top Hat, has engineered Kritik to address the core pedagogical tension between advanced AI use and measurable critical thinking. The system does not merely attempt...
- Primary sector: AI Infrastructure
- Check published results and source limitations before making a decision based on this announcement.
Mohsen Shahini, a founder with experience at Top Hat, has engineered Kritik to address the core pedagogical tension between advanced AI use and measurable critical thinking. The system does not merely attempt to police student usage; rather, it reframes the learning objective from 'Is the answer correct?' to 'How is the student improving their thinking process?' This shift in focus represents a significant evolution in educational assessment.
The platform’s ingenuity lies in its dual approach: peer-to-peer evaluation and deep AI usage transparency. Kritik's original offering, enhancing collaborative grading (Kritik360), keeps the human element central—students grade each other while also critiquing each other's use of AI. This structured interaction prevents both academic cheating and technological over-reliance from becoming passive habits.
Kritik shifts academic assessment from judging final correctness to evaluating the transparent process and development of critical thinking skills using AI as an explicit tool.
The centerpiece is VisibleAI. Instead of functioning as a typical 'humanizer' detection tool, it provides full visibility into the writing process itself. Students work within this controlled environment with access to multiple LLMs, and the system meticulously tracks three critical data streams: direct student input, utilized prompts given by the user, and the volume of content sourced from AI chatbots. This level of granular transparency moves assessment away from a binary pass/fail judgment and toward an evaluative process that assesses process as part of the grade. Shahini notes this makes the expectation clear: students are expected to use AI; their mastery in doing so becomes the measurable skill.
This model is particularly resonant for the Canadian academic landscape. Universities often grapple with maintaining pedagogical rigor while acknowledging technology’s deep integration into student life. By making the interaction with AI visible, Kritik gives educators a diagnostic tool rather than just an accusation. It allows institutions to design learning outcomes that explicitly value sophisticated prompt engineering and the critical skill of synthesizing LLM output—skills increasingly demanded by modern employers in tech and knowledge economies.
Put this signal in context
Get the week’s essential Canadian tech.
Five minutes. One useful email. No noise.
Sources & technical notesShowHide
Where this story is grounded
Check the cited material to distinguish announcements from demonstrated results.
What to evaluate next
This box highlights the systems, workflows, and decisions the article helps you assess.
Stay in the signal after this story.
Follow the company page, then jump into the broader sector hub before you leave the story.
Keep the company context attached as you read the rest of the coverage.
Weekly Canadian tech signals, distilled for operators.
Subscribe to the signalFree weekly briefing • Unsubscribe anytime
A practical checklist for Canadian policy, privacy, procurement, and governance teams who need a quick way to sanity-check AI deployments before they scale.
Open resource